VPS vs Shared Hosting: What To Choose?
Most businesses begin their hosting journey with shared or VPS hosting in Australia due to their cost-effectiveness. Both options are suitable for starting out and offer varying levels of control, performance, resource support, etc.
In this article, we will understand VPS vs shared hosting in detai. When going for a web hosting solution, it is best to consider an Australian domain host that supports integration for seamless performance.
VPS Vs Shared Hosting: What is Shared Hosting?
Shared hosting is equal to sharing an apartment with your sibling or friend. When you share an apartment, you share a kitchen and bathroom. In the same way, with shared hosting, you share space and resources.
All the users of the physical web server share their CPU, disk space, RAM, etc. Furthermore, as space and resources are shared between users, the web hosting providers control the whole environment to ensure environmental stability.
VPS Vs Shared Hosting: What is VPS Hosting?
VPS hosting is one physical server divided virtually using software called a hypervisor. The difference here is that though the web server is shared between users, the partition made is independent. This means you get several small virtual machines with their own resource independence and isolation from one another. When you rent a VPS server, you enjoy your own OS, RAM, disk space, etc. This offers more control and flexibility to configure your environment according to your needs.
VPS Hosting Vs Shared Hosting: Which One to Choose?
| Point of Difference VPS vs Shared Hosting | Shared Hosting | VPS Hosting |
| Resource Allocation | One physical server is shared with other users. Therefore, there is a sharing of resources. | With VPS hosting, though a physical server is shared, each user gets an independent portion. |
| Scalability | Shared hosting doesn’t offer a scalable environment. | VPS hosting is highly flexible, making scalability easy. |
| Security | The environment is shared along with resource sharing, which creates a risk of security due to neighbouring effects. | With VPS hosting, although the environment is still shared, each user enjoys their independent resources with isolation, so there is no neighbouring effect. |
| Performance | As the environment is shared, the user can face neighbouring effects. So, a simple spike in one website can create performance issues for the website sharing the server. | VPS offers an independent, isolated, private environment irrespective of sharing the environment, so users don’t face any kind of performance issues with the web server. |
| Customisation | There is no scope for customisation with a shared hosting server as everyone shares the server. | VPS offers each user control over private portions of the server, allowing the user to configure the environment according to their needs. |
| Cost | Shared hosting plans are more reasonable than VPS hosting plans. | VPS hosting plans are expensive compared to shared hosting plans. |
| Control | A shared hosting environment offers no control. | You get better control to configure your environment with VPS hosting. |
Conclusion
The turmoil of VPS or shared hosting depends on the specific needs of your infrastructure and the level of expertise you have. Businesses that are just starting out with low traffic volume and limited technical expertise should go for shared hosting. However, if you have decent traffic volume but lack technical expertise, then going for managed VPS hosting services is best.
